Burgess v. Kuhlmann
This text of Burgess v. Kuhlmann (Burgess v. Kuhlmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 17-MAR-2022 07:57 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP SCPW-22-00000106
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
JOHN TIMOTHY BURGESS, Petitioner
vs.
LUISA KUHLMANN, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.) Upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on March 9, 2022, petitioner presents no special reason for invoking the supreme court’s original jurisdiction. See Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 511, 512, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976). Therefore, It is ordered that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. It is further ordered that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for writ of habeas corpus without payment of the filing fee. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 17, 2022. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burgess v. Kuhlmann, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-kuhlmann-haw-2022.