Burgess v. Horn & Hardart Co.

252 A.D. 854, 300 N.Y.S. 1331, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6550
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burgess v. Horn & Hardart Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 A.D. 847

Opinion

An issue of fact as to the negligence of the defendant in failing properly to maintain the revolving door was presented and should have been submitted to the jury. Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event. Present —■ Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. Horn & Hardart Co., 252 A.D. 854, 300 N.Y.S. 1331, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6550 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 854 (Burgess v. Horn & Hardart Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.