Burgess v. Hand

Norfolk County Circuit Court

Burgess v. Hand

17 Va. Cir. 224, 1989 Va. Cir. LEXIS 193

CourtNorfolk County Circuit Court

DecidedJuly 12, 1989

DocketCase No. (Law) L-88-2541

StatusPublished

This text of 17 Va. Cir. 224 (Burgess v. Hand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Norfolk County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgess v. Hand, 17 Va. Cir. 224, 1989 Va. Cir. LEXIS 193 (Va. Super. Ct. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE ALFRED W. WHITEHURST

I have studied the law and arguments presented, and counsel are to be commended for the memoranda and presentation.

The research leads me to the conclusion that a policeman may plead sovereign immunity for acts of simple negligence committed in. the performance of his official duty. Robbins v. Wessel, 12 Va. Cir. 231 (1988).

I find that a distinction cannot be made from the high school gym teacher (playing tackle football without wearing protective equipment). Lentz v. Morris, 236 Va. 78 (1988). It is true that Virginia Code Section 46.1-226 applies to criminal prosecution, but . civil liability is not affected by the section.

The present case does involve judgment and discretion in the driving of the police vehicle. The waiver of governmental immunity must be an explicit waiver. Hinchey v. Ogden, 226 Va. 234 (1983).

Therefore, the Court rules that the doctrine of sovereign immunity does protect the policeman from acts of simple negligence committed in the performance of his official duty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI