Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY

978 A.2d 349, 602 Pa. 158, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1594

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 6, 2009·No. 92 EM 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is *159 directed to forward the instant filings to Petitioner’s counsel of record. See Commonwealth v. Burgess, 3369 EDA 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is *159 directed to forward the instant filings to Petitioner’s counsel of record. See Commonwealth v. Burgess, 3369 EDA 2008.

Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY, 978 A.2d 349, 602 Pa. 158, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1594 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

978 A.2d 349 (Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related