Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY

978 A.2d 349, 602 Pa. 158, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1594

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 6, 2009

Docket92 EM 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 978 A.2d 349 (Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgess v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS PHILA. COUNTY, 978 A.2d 349, 602 Pa. 158, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1594 (Pa. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is *159 directed to forward the instant filings to Petitioner’s counsel of record. See Commonwealth v. Burgess, 3369 EDA 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2009, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 537 Pa. 167, 642 A.2d 453, 462 (1994) (hybrid representation improper). The Prothonotary is *159 directed to forward the instant filings to Petitioner’s counsel of record. See Commonwealth v. Burgess, 3369 EDA 2008.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

978 A.2d 349, 602 Pa. 158, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-court-of-common-pleas-phila-county-pa-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack