Burgess v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Burgess v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

533 F. App'x 271

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 18, 2013·No. No. 13-1344·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH, 2013 WL 645982 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henry M. Burgess, Jr. appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment to the Defendant in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burgess v. Costco Wholesale, No. 4:10-cv-01678-RBH, 2013 WL 645982 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Burgess v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 533 F. App'x 271 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

533 F. App'x 271 (Burgess v. Costco Wholesale Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.