Burgess v. Byrnes
This text of 229 A.D. 820 (Burgess v. Byrnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hinman, Acting P. J., Davis, Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Whitmyer, J., dissents and votes for a reversal on the law and the facts, and for a new trial unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $1,000, and if such stipulation is made the judgment should be so modified and as modified the judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-byrnes-nyappdiv-1930.