Burgess v. Burgess

51 A. 1074, 71 N.H. 293, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 27
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided April 1, 1902·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question in this case was decided in 1885, in Kimball v. Kimball, 63 N. H. 598, and the construction then put upon the statute in question ( Laws 1883, c. 14 ) was adopted by the legislature in 1891 by re-enactment without change. P. S., c. 175, s. 3; Parsons v. Durham, 70 N. H. 44, 45. Consent cannot confer jurisdiction where none exists. Whenever it appears that a court has no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the suit, the proceeding is dismissed even if no objection is made. See Weeks v. Fowler, ante, p. 221.

Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. Burgess, 51 A. 1074, 71 N.H. 293, 1902 N.H. LEXIS 27 (N.H. 1902).

51 A. 1074 (Burgess v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daine v. Daine
951 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2008)
State v. Polk
907 A.2d 966 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2006)
Kennedy v. Titcomb
553 A.2d 1322 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1989)
Porter v. Porter
296 A.2d 900 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1972)
In Re Bunker Estate
266 A.2d 114 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1970)
Manchester Dairy System, Inc. v. Hayward
132 A. 12 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1926)
Straw's Petition
102 A. 628 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1917)
Shatney v. Shatney
83 A. 124 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1912)