Burgess v. Burgess
This text of Burgess v. Burgess (Burgess v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
SARAH BURGESS,
Appellant,
v.
TYLER BURGESS,
Appellee.
No. 2D2024-1329
January 31, 2025
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Nancy L. Jacobs, Judge.
Brandon A. Fortuno of Fortuno Law, PLLC, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
SILBERMAN, Judge. Sarah Burgess appeals the trial court's nonfinal order denying her petition to temporarily relocate with the parties' minor children. Burgess raises several issues, none of which warrant reversal. The record supports the trial court's determination that she did not carry her burden to show that relocation is in the best interests of the minor children. See § 61.13001(8), Fla. Stat. (2024); Coyle v. Coyle, 8 So. 3d 1271, 1272-73 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). Affirmed.
VILLANTI and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burgess v. Burgess, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-v-burgess-fladistctapp-2025.