Burgess v. Brown

127 F. App'x 366
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 13, 2005·No. No. 04-56149·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Reginald P. Burgess appeals pro se the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) decision denying his request to intervene in his former attorney’s appeal from a bankruptcy court’s denial of sanctions. We lack jurisdiction over Burgess’ appeal because the BAP’s order denying Burgess’ request to intervene constituted a final judgment and he did not file his notice of appeal within 30 days of that order. See United States v. City of Oakland, 958 F.2d 300, 301-02 (9th Cir.1992); see also Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (indicating that a civil appeal must be filed within 30 days after final judgment).

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. Brown, 127 F. App'x 366 (9th Cir. 2005).

127 F. App'x 366 (Burgess v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related