Burgess v. Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 28, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01641·Unknown

Opinion

1 MICHAEL R. O’NEIL, SBN 155134 LISA D. NICOLLS, SBN 234376 PETER A. AUSTIN SBN 252067 KEVIN N. ROYER, SBN 312185 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 850, Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 446-2300 Facsimile: (916) 503-4000 E-mail: moneil@murphyaustin.com E-mail: lnicolls@murphyaustin.com E-mail: paustin@murphyaustin.com E-mail: kroyer@murphyaustin.com Attorneys for Defendant and Cross-Claimant SARA BURGESS, an individual; ANGELA Case No. 1:23-cv-01641-JLT-BAM ALVAREZ, an individual; MICHAEL ARNDT, an individual; TERESA ALFORD, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] an individual; JESSICA CARTER, an PROTECTIVE ORDER individual; STEVEN PIECH, an individual; JEN REDFORD, an individual; CHERI MADDOX, an individual; ELIZABETH TARTER, an individual; and STACEY Action filed: November 24, 2023 TAYLOR, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. LLC, a California limited liability company; FREDERICK WENTWORTH, an individual; JUDY A. WENTWORTH, an individual; RONALD L. POLHEMUS, an individual; CLYTA L. POLHEMUS, an individual; DECEASED, an individual; MARY E. KESSEL, an individual; ESTATE OF JULIE OGG, DECEASED, an individual and dba as Heritage Dry Cleaners; ARLENE LAENG, an individual and dba as Heritage Dry Cleaners; JAMES E. LAENG, an individual and dba as Heritage Dry Cleaners; ESTATE OF SALLY HOENES, DECEASED, an individual and dba as Heritage Dry Cleaners; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 1 AND RELATED CROSSCLAIMS

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this action may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order (“Order”). The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge that, as set forth in Section 12.3 of this Order (Filing Protected Material), this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; this Court’s Local Rules (e.g., Local Rule 141) set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a Party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Court: any judge to whom this action may be assigned, including the Honorable Judge Jennifer L. Thurston and the Honorable Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. 2.5 Designated House Counsel: House Counsel who seek access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” information in this action. 1 2.6 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 2.7 Disclosure or Discovery M aterial: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this action. 2.8 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience that is pertinent to this action and who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action; (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor; and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 2.9 Final Disposition: the later of (a) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice or (b) final judgment issued in this action; provided, however, that with respect to each of the foregoing, the respective time periods for the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, re-hearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action—including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law—have elapsed. 2.10 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.11 House Counsel: attorneys, if any, who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.12 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.13 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 1 2.14 Party: any party to this action, including (i) any individual; and (ii) any entity and all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.15 Producing Party: a Party o r Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.16 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services for this action (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.17 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 2.18 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE 3.1 The protections conferred by this Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (i) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (ii) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (iii) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information either (i) known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or (ii) obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after Final Disposition of this action, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 1 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in w

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burgess v. Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Burgess v. Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC (Burgess v. Alternative Sierra Investments, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)