Burgess, Shaun v. Castle Keepers, Inc.
This text of Burgess, Shaun v. Castle Keepers, Inc. (Burgess, Shaun v. Castle Keepers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 17, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01175-CV
SHAUN BURGESS, Appellant
V.
CASTLE KEEPERS, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 002-01984-2012
ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s motion to extend time to file reporter’s record. In his
motion, appellant asks the Court to extend time to file the reporter’s record because he lacks the
funds to pay for a complete record and intends to request and pay for a partial record as allowed
by rule 34.6(c) . We GRANT appellant’s motion as follows: Court Reporter Marigay Black is
ORDERED to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) the reporter’s
record; (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verfication that
appellant has not requested or paid for the record. We notify appellant that if we receive
verification of non-payment, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(C). Appellant’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS after either the reporter’s record is filed
or the Court Reporter verification is filed.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burgess, Shaun v. Castle Keepers, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-shaun-v-castle-keepers-inc-texapp-2013.