Burgess Battery Company v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents

204 F.2d 35
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedApril 3, 1953
Docket11436
StatusPublished

This text of 204 F.2d 35 (Burgess Battery Company v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgess Battery Company v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents, 204 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint in an action under Section 21 of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1071, 60 Stat. 435, and Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 35 U.S. C.A. § 63, in which the appellant sought to have the court authorize the registration on the Principal Register, under the provisions of Section 2(f) of the Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1052, 60 Stat. 428, as a trade-mark for batteries, of a design consisting of alternate black and white stripes of indefinite size and extent. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the District Court. Burgess Battery Co. v. Mar-zall, 101 F.Supp. 812.

Affirmed.

WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgess Battery Co. v. Marzall
101 F. Supp. 812 (District of Columbia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 F.2d 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgess-battery-company-v-robert-c-watson-commissioner-of-patents-cadc-1953.