Burger v. Willetts

228 A.D. 702

This text of 228 A.D. 702 (Burger v. Willetts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burger v. Willetts, 228 A.D. 702 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion to examine defendant Frank Willetts with respect to matters arising under five paragraphs of the amended complaint, except in so far as it related to paragraph 16 thereof, modified by granting, in addition to paragraph 16, the examination sought in so far as it relates to matters arising under paragraphs 25 and 48, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiff, appellant. (Naumer v. Gray, 28 App. Div. 529; Lanyon’s Detective Agency v. Cochrane, 240 N. Y. 274, 277; Scanlon v. Kuehn, 225 App. Div. 256, 258; Skandinaviska Granit Aktiebolaget v. Weiss, 226 id. 56.) Examination to proceed on five days’ notice at same place and hour. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanyon's Detective Agency, Inc. v. Cochrane
148 N.E. 520 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)
Naumer v. Gray
28 A.D. 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Scanlon v. Kuehn
225 A.D. 256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D. 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-v-willetts-nyappdiv-1930.