Burger v. Tobias

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356
Saratoga Chancery Court·Decided May 24, 1844·Published

Opinion

Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.

Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burger v. Tobias, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27 (Burger v. Tobias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.