Burger v. Tobias

Saratoga Chancery Court

Burger v. Tobias

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356

DecidedMay 24, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27 (Burger v. Tobias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Saratoga Chancery Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burger v. Tobias, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.

Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.

Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-v-tobias-nychanctsara-1844.