Burger v. Tobias
4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356
Opinion
Decided that the examinations of defendants on oath, before a master, are evidence against them, although they have refused to sign such examinations. That it is to be presumed, examinations taken down before a sworn officer of the court, in the discharge of his duty, are taken down correelly ; until the contrary is shown.
Decree of the vice chancellor as to Newstadt affirmed with sosts, The part,of the decree appealed from by defendant-Tobias also affirmed with costs,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burger v. Tobias, 4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 356 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).
4 Sarat. Ch. Sent. 27 (Burger v. Tobias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.