Burger v. Burger

182 A.D.2d 667, 585 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6029
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 13, 1992
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 182 A.D.2d 667 (Burger v. Burger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burger v. Burger, 182 A.D.2d 667, 585 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6029 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

In an action for divorce which was granted upon the defendant’s default in answering, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), dated June 11, 1990, which denied his application to vacate the default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A defendant seeking to have his default vacated must show an acceptable reason for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (Black v Black, 141 AD2d 689; Kraus Bros, v Hoffman & Co., 99 AD2d 401; Lins v Lins, 98 AD2d 608). The defendant at bar failed to demonstrate either. Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleet Finance, Inc. v. Nielsen
234 A.D.2d 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
182 A.D.2d 667, 585 N.Y.S.2d 703, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6029, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-v-burger-nyappdiv-1992.