Burger v. Burger

340 N.W.2d 400, 215 Neb. 699, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1330
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 18, 1983
Docket82-855
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 340 N.W.2d 400 (Burger v. Burger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burger v. Burger, 340 N.W.2d 400, 215 Neb. 699, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1330 (Neb. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal in a proceeding for the dissolution of a marriage. The trial court dissolved the marriage; awarded custody of the minor children of the parties to the respondent husband; awarded the residence property of the parties to the petitioner wife, subject to payment of one-half of the equity to the respondent; and awarded alimony to the petitioner in the sum of $605.77 per month for 19 months and $400 per month for 101 months, the alimony to terminate upon remarriage of the wife or the death of either party.

The respondent has appealed, and contends the court erred in failing to make an equitable division of the marital estate, in awarding alimony to the petitioner, and in awarding an attorney fee to the petitioner.

The parties were married in 1962, and have four children, two of whom were minors at the time of trial and still at home: Jon, born December 27, 1964, and J. Robert, born March 22, 1968.

The respondent is employed by the Burlington Northern Railroad as a conductor and brakeman. His earnings in 1979 amounted to $25,000; in 1980, $29,000; and in 1981, over $33,000. At the time of trial his average earnings for the first 8y2 months of 1982 on an annual basis would amount to nearly $40,000.

The petitioner, who is 40 years of age, worked during the marriage, and had been employed as a secretary by Hoskins-Western-Sonderegger for approxi *701 mately 5 years when she was terminated on August 16, 1982. During the last year of employment, she had earned slightly in excess of $10,000. She has had some health problems, including depression, for which she has been hospitalized a number of times. At trial she testified that she was “all right” and had been released by her physician to return to work.

The ultimate test for division of marital property and an award of alimony is one of reasonableness. Koubek v. Koubek, 212 Neb. 2, 321 N.W.2d 55 (1982).

From our review of the record we are satisfied that the division of property and award of alimony made by the trial court, and the award of an attorney fee to the petitioner, were correct. The judgment of the District Court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. Taylor
386 N.W.2d 851 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Burhoop v. Burhoop
380 N.W.2d 254 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1986)
Black v. Black
378 N.W.2d 849 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
McCollister v. McCollister
365 N.W.2d 825 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Sonntag v. Sonntag
365 N.W.2d 411 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Rockwood v. Rockwood
360 N.W.2d 497 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1985)
Guggenmos v. Guggenmos
359 N.W.2d 87 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)
Ruhnke v. Ruhnke
355 N.W.2d 339 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
340 N.W.2d 400, 215 Neb. 699, 1983 Neb. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-v-burger-neb-1983.