Burger v. Burger
This text of 26 S.E.2d 615 (Burger v. Burger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the fact that the undisputed testimony-showed that the earning capacity of the husband shortly before the hearing was $50 per week, and the evidence being in conflict on the material issue as to the value of property owned by the husband and whether or not he was physically able to earn money, the allowance of $50 per month as temporary alimony, and $35 as attorney’s fees, was not excessive or an abuse of discretion, although the uncontradicted evidence showed that the husband was temporarily out of employment at the time of the alimony hearing. Code, § 30-205; Rigdon v. Rigdon, 174 Ga. 903 (164 S. E. 677); Roberts v. Roberts, 190 Ga. 649 (10 S. E. 2d, 62); Hannah v. Hannah, 191 Ga. 134 (11 S. E. 2d, 779).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.E.2d 615, 196 Ga. 428, 1943 Ga. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-v-burger-ga-1943.