Burger King Corp. v. Village of Larchmont

52 A.D.2d 898, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12741
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 17, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 898 (Burger King Corp. v. Village of Larchmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burger King Corp. v. Village of Larchmont, 52 A.D.2d 898, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12741 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 30, 1975, affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiff Venerose. We agree with Special Term that the plaintiffs sustained their burden of proving that the amended zoning ordinance in question is unconstitutional and confiscatory as applied to their property (see Williams v Town of Oyster Bay, 32 NY2d 78, 81-82). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Envirotech of America, Inc. v. Dadey
234 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 898, 384 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-king-corp-v-village-of-larchmont-nyappdiv-1976.