Burger King Corp. v. Kastogianis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burger King Corp. v. Kastogianis

696 So. 2d 884, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6244, 1997 WL 309976

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 1997

DocketNo. 96-0438

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 884 (Burger King Corp. v. Kastogianis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burger King Corp. v. Kastogianis, 696 So. 2d 884, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6244, 1997 WL 309976 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm on all issues on the main appeal. In particular, we find no abuse of discretion in the grant of new trial because of erroneous instructions on the burden of proof. As to the issue on cross appeal, we expressly hold that the trial court is free in the new trial to revisit its earlier decision as to the admissibility of other acts to show foreseeability.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FARMER, Judge.

We affirm on all issues on the main appeal. In particular, we find no abuse of discretion in the grant of new trial because of erroneous instructions on the burden of proof. As to the issue on cross appeal, we expressly hold that the trial court is free in the new trial to revisit its earlier decision as to the admissibility of other acts to show foreseeability.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 884, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 6244, 1997 WL 309976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-king-corp-v-kastogianis-fladistctapp-1997.