Burger Iron Co. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Burger Iron Co. v. Tracy

682 N.E.2d 655, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3546

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 6, 1997

Docket97-1214

StatusPublished

This text of 682 N.E.2d 655 (Burger Iron Co. v. Tracy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burger Iron Co. v. Tracy, 682 N.E.2d 655, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3546 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of case Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48 from the Board of Tax Appeals. On July 17, 1997, the Clerk of this court filed the documents transmitted from the Board of Tax Appeals that had been certified as the record in this case. The documents filed as the record with this court include, in addition to the transcript and pleadings filed with the Board of Tax Appeals, a file folder labeled “96M0048” that appears to contain copies of various documents and correspondence filed with the Board of Tax Appeals, and an empty file folder labeled “95M1078.” On July 29, 1997, the Board of Tax Appeals submitted a letter indicating that its “file jackets” for case Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48 were inadvertently included in the documents certified as the record, and requesting that the jackets be returned.

It appearing to the court that the documents filed as the record of ease Nos. 95-M-1078 and 95-M-48 include the Board of Tax Appeals’ jackets,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Board of Tax Appeals’ request for the return of the file jackets be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of case Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48 from the Board of Tax Appeals. On July 17, 1997, the Clerk of this court filed the documents transmitted from the Board of Tax Appeals that had been certified as the record in this case. The documents filed as the record with this court include, in addition to the transcript and pleadings filed with the Board of Tax Appeals, a file folder labeled “96M0048” that appears to contain copies of various documents and correspondence filed with the Board of Tax Appeals, and an empty file folder labeled “95M1078.” On July 29, 1997, the Board of Tax Appeals submitted a letter indicating that its “file jackets” for case Nos. 95-M-1078 and 96-M-48 were inadvertently included in the documents certified as the record, and requesting that the jackets be returned.

It appearing to the court that the documents filed as the record of ease Nos. 95-M-1078 and 95-M-48 include the Board of Tax Appeals’ jackets,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Board of Tax Appeals’ request for the return of the file jackets be, and hereby is, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

682 N.E.2d 655, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1470, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 3546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burger-iron-co-v-tracy-ohio-1997.