Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources

469 So. 2d 1223, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 9720
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 29, 1985·No. No. 84-CA-0371·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

EDWARDS, Judge.

After a thorough review of the record and testimony, we are unable to conclude that the trial court’s judgment finding the parties to be equally at fault in causing the accident is clearly wrong or that the $13,-052.52 damage award to the plaintiffs is an [1224]*1224abuse of the trial court’s much discretion. Without a clear articulation of manifest error, under Arceneaux v. Domingue, 365 So.2d 1330 (La.1978) and Reck v. Stevens, 373 So.2d 498 (La.1979), we must not disturb the trial court’s findings or damage awards. For this reason and for the oral reasons assigned by the trial judge, we affirm.

Costs of this appeal are assessed against appellant in the amount of $50.00.

AFFIRMED.

SHORTESS, J., dissents with reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources, 469 So. 2d 1223, 1985 La. App. LEXIS 9720 (La. Ct. App. 1985).

469 So. 2d 1223 (Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szwedt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
479 So. 2d 453 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Burge v. State ex rel. Louisiana Department of Health & Human Resources
475 So. 2d 360 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1985)