Burgauer v. Parker

61 S.W. 381, 69 Ark. 109, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 24
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 23, 1901
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 S.W. 381 (Burgauer v. Parker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burgauer v. Parker, 61 S.W. 381, 69 Ark. 109, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 24 (Ark. 1901).

Opinion

Hughes, J.,

(after stating the facts.) We are of the opinion that there is error in the decree of the chancery court in this ease, for which it must be reversed. As the judgment in favor of the appellant was rendered before the lot in controversy was occupied as a homestead, and execution on the judgment was levied upon the property before the lien of the judgment had expired, it'was subject to be sold to satisfy the same. The occupation of it subsequent to the rendition of the judgment, an execution upon which had -been levied upon it before the judgment lien' had expired, did not relieve it from the lien, though the occupation was prior to the levy of the execution. Simpson v. Biffle, 63 Ark. 299; Reynolds v. Tenant, 51 Ark. 84.

The decree is reversed and remanded, with directions to quash the supersedeas.

Battle, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deloney v. Dillard
40 S.W.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1931)
Cazort & McGehee Co. v. Byars
150 S.W. 109 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 S.W. 381, 69 Ark. 109, 1901 Ark. LEXIS 24, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgauer-v-parker-ark-1901.