Burgan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burgan v. State

675 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4710, 1996 WL 239286

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 10, 1996

DocketNo. 94-2921

StatusPublished

This text of 675 So. 2d 175 (Burgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burgan v. State, 675 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4710, 1996 WL 239286 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

GOSHORN, Judge.

Kharibe Burgan appeals from his conviction for second degree murder,¹ two counts of robbery with a firearm,² one count of attempted robbery with a firearm,³ one count of criminal conspiracy,⁴ and one count of burglary with a firearm.⁵ We find merit only in his contention that it was error to deny his request to charge the jury on third degree murder, with the underlying felony being aggravated assault.

Our supreme court has held that the failure to give a requested instruction is per se reversible error where the evidence supports the giving of the instruction. See Herrington v. State, 538 So.2d 850 (Fla.1989); see also Green v. State, 475 So.2d 235 (Fla.1985); Peterson v. State, 643 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Elkin v. State, 636 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Jackson v. State, 622 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Garcia v. State, 574 So.2d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Sub judice, there was testimony that defendant held a gun on one victim and ordered him and the other occupants to lie on the floor. The victims followed the order because they were afraid. Defendant at some point handed the gun to a codefendant and began searching for marijuana. These facts supported a finding of aggravated assault. See § 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Accordingly, we reverse defendant’s conviction for second degree murder and remand for a new trial. We affirm each of defendant’s other convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOSHORN, Judge.

Kharibe Burgan appeals from his conviction for second degree murder,¹ two counts of robbery with a firearm,² one count of attempted robbery with a firearm,³ one count of criminal conspiracy,⁴ and one count of burglary with a firearm.⁵ We find merit only in his contention that it was error to deny his request to charge the jury on third degree murder, with the underlying felony being aggravated assault.

Our supreme court has held that the failure to give a requested instruction is per se reversible error where the evidence supports the giving of the instruction. See Herrington v. State, 538 So.2d 850 (Fla.1989); see also Green v. State, 475 So.2d 235 (Fla.1985); Peterson v. State, 643 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Elkin v. State, 636 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Jackson v. State, 622 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Garcia v. State, 574 So.2d 240 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Sub judice, there was testimony that defendant held a gun on one victim and ordered him and the other occupants to lie on the floor. The victims followed the order because they were afraid. Defendant at some point handed the gun to a codefendant and began searching for marijuana. These facts supported a finding of aggravated assault. See § 784.021, Fla.Stat. (1993).

Accordingly, we reverse defendant’s conviction for second degree murder and remand for a new trial. We affirm each of defendant’s other convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

675 So. 2d 175, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 4710, 1996 WL 239286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burgan-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack