Burfitt v. Erving

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided December 20, 2019·No. 1:18-cv-00260·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Lawrence R. Burfitt, II,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:18cv260

C/O M. Erving, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on December 2, 2019 (Doc. 47). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 47) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 47) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED. Any request for certificate of appealability or request to certify an appeal would not be taken in good faith and would be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burfitt v. Erving, (S.D. Ohio 2019).

Burfitt v. Erving (Burfitt v. Erving) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related