Buresh v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Buresh v. State

2017 ND 114, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 118, 2017 WL 2119466

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedMay 16, 2017

Docket20160378

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 114 (Buresh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buresh v. State, 2017 ND 114, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 118, 2017 WL 2119466 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Paul Buresh appeals a distinct court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Buresh argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to entering his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Buresh’s application for post-conviction relief.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Carol Ronning Kapsner

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Paul Buresh appeals a distinct court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Buresh argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to entering his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Buresh’s application for post-conviction relief.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Carol Ronning Kapsner

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 114, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 118, 2017 WL 2119466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buresh-v-state-nd-2017.