Bures v. Reichsbank

261 A.D. 1067, 27 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8771

This text of 261 A.D. 1067 (Bures v. Reichsbank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bures v. Reichsbank, 261 A.D. 1067, 27 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Judgment and orders unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment denied, on the ground that there are issues of fact which may be determined only upon a trial of the action. Present — O’MaEey, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
261 A.D. 1067, 27 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bures-v-reichsbank-nyappdiv-1941.