Bureau Veritas Commodites and Trade, Inc. v. Richard Scott Allinson, Joseph Chapman, Joshua Husvar, Renisha Nanoo, Stefanus Nel and Cotecna Inspection, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 18, 2021
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00060-CV ——————————— BUREAU VERITAS COMMODITIES AND TRADE, INC., Appellant V. RICHARD SCOTT ALLINSON, JOSEPH CHAPMAN, JOSHUA HUSVAR, STEFANUS NEL, AND COTECNA INSPECTION, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-51445
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Bureau Veritas Commodities and Trade, Inc., appealed from the
trial court’s January 13, 2021 order denying appellant’s application for a temporary
injunction. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal,
representing that it “no longer seeks to appeal” the trial court’s January 13, 2021 order. No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). Further, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of
conference representing that appellees, Richard Scott Allinson, Joseph Chapman,
Joshua Husvar, Stefanus Nel, and Cotecna Inspection, Inc., do not oppose the relief
requested in appellant’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bureau Veritas Commodites and Trade, Inc. v. Richard Scott Allinson, Joseph Chapman, Joshua Husvar, Renisha Nanoo, Stefanus Nel and Cotecna Inspection, Inc. (Bureau Veritas Commodites and Trade, Inc. v. Richard Scott Allinson, Joseph Chapman, Joshua Husvar, Renisha Nanoo, Stefanus Nel and Cotecna Inspection, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.