Burdine v. Mustin

33 Ala. 634

Opinion

R. W. WALKER, J.—

The fact that an attorney has filed a brief, in which he discusses the merits of the case, and, at the same time, insists that the appeal ought to be dismissed, as not having been properly taken, cannot be considered as equivalent to a joinder in error, or as a waiver of defects in the appeal bond.

[2.] The appeal in this case falls completely within the rule settled in Dumas v. Hunter, 28 Ala. 688; and, upon the authority of that case, must be dismissed.