Burdick v. Wygant

161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1115

This text of 161 A.D. 907 (Burdick v. Wygant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burdick v. Wygant, 161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Decree modified by striking therefrom the amount of §3,000 received for rentals; also by reciting that it is without prejudice to the right of the appellant to establish on the final accounting as delivered by him as such executor to Ethel B. Wygant 250 shares of the stock of Burdick & Son, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents against the appellant personally. The court disapproves of the seventeenth finding of fact and the third conclusion of law of the decision of the surrogate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D. 907, 145 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burdick-v-wygant-nyappdiv-1914.