Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, PLLC

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: June 5, 2009
• Docket: 09-1216
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1216

GEORGE E. BURDICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PRITCHETT & BIRCH, PLLC; LLOYD C. SMITH, JR.; REGINA PARKER; SAMUEL GRIMES; CHRISTOPHER B. MCLENDON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:08-cv-00053-BO)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker, BAKER, JENKINS, JONES & DALY, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

George E. Burdick appeals the district court’s orders

granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint for

lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett &

Birch, PLLC, No. 4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008;

Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED