Burdick v. Hackman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Burdick v. Hackman

169 N.E. 925, 90 Ind. App. 722, 1930 Ind. App. LEXIS 32

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided January 31, 1930·No. No. 13,829.·Published

Opinion

Remy, C. J.

It appearing to the court that this cause has been compromised and settled, a part of the compromise settlement being that the judgment of the trial court be reversed without regard to the merits of the appeal and’ that the cause be remanded to the Dearborn Circuit Court for further action in accordance with the terms of the compromise settlement agreement, the judgment is therefore accordingly reversed, with directions to the trial court to sustain a motion for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Remy, C. J.

It appearing to the court that this cause has been compromised and settled, a part of the compromise settlement being that the judgment of the trial court be reversed without regard to the merits of the appeal and’ that the cause be remanded to the Dearborn Circuit Court for further action in accordance with the terms of the compromise settlement agreement, the judgment is therefore accordingly reversed, with directions to the trial court to sustain a motion for a new trial.

Burdick v. Hackman, 169 N.E. 925, 90 Ind. App. 722, 1930 Ind. App. LEXIS 32 (Ind. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

169 N.E. 925 (Burdick v. Hackman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.