Burdick v. Burdick

641 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 1994 WL 457278
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 24, 1994
DocketNo. 93-714
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 641 So. 2d 200 (Burdick v. Burdick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burdick v. Burdick, 641 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 1994 WL 457278 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to reduce to final judgment an order awarding appellate attorney’s fees which was entered prior to the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. “It is axiomatic that a court has the power to enforce its orders, judgments and decrees by appropriate action.” Coggan v. Coggan, 183 So.2d 839, 841 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 820 (Fla.1966). The trial court also correctly ordered appellant to pay interest on the amount from July 10, 1989. § 55.-03(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Coggan v. Coggan, supra.

AFFIRMED.

[201]*201ALLEN, MICHAEL E., KAHN, CHARLES J., and MICKLE, STEPHAN P., Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blount v. State
641 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 1994 WL 457278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burdick-v-burdick-fladistctapp-1994.