Burdick v. Burdick

641 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 1994 WL 457278
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 1994·No. No. 93-714·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant argues that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to reduce to final judgment an order awarding appellate attorney’s fees which was entered prior to the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. “It is axiomatic that a court has the power to enforce its orders, judgments and decrees by appropriate action.” Coggan v. Coggan, 183 So.2d 839, 841 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 188 So.2d 820 (Fla.1966). The trial court also correctly ordered appellant to pay interest on the amount from July 10, 1989. § 55.-03(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Coggan v. Coggan, supra.

AFFIRMED.

[201]*201ALLEN, MICHAEL E., KAHN, CHARLES J., and MICKLE, STEPHAN P., Associate Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burdick v. Burdick, 641 So. 2d 200, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8463, 1994 WL 457278 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 200 (Burdick v. Burdick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blount v. State
641 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)