Burdett, Smith & Co. v. Woodworth & Co.
This text of 71 Iowa 753 (Burdett, Smith & Co. v. Woodworth & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is but one error assigned and argued. It presents the question as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment. We have carefully examined the evidence, and have reached the conclusion that we cannot disturb the judgment. It is not necessary to set out the evidence. It is sufficient to say that, applying the same rule to the judgment which is applied by this court to the verdict of a jury, the judgment finds support in the evidence. It does not appear without conflict th at the mortgage was fraudulent. It is to be remembered that we are not required to try the cause anew in this court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Iowa 753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burdett-smith-co-v-woodworth-co-iowa-1887.