Burdeshaw v. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Burdeshaw v. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co.

187 So. 2d 892, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3344

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 1966

DocketNo. 35241

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 892 (Burdeshaw v. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burdeshaw v. Merrill-Stevens Dry Dock Co., 187 So. 2d 892, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3344 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 23 February 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [893]*893there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI