Burden v. State

2020 ND 238, 950 N.W.2d 771

• Court: North Dakota Supreme Court
• Decided: November 19, 2020
• Docket: 20200143
• Status: Published

Opinion

20200143 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 19, 2020 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 238

James Ryan Burden, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20200143

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Thomas A. Gehrz, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellee. Burden v. State No. 20200143

[¶1] James Ryan Burden appeals from an order denying his application for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Burden was charged with luring minors by computer or other electronic means, a class B felony. Burden pleaded guilty under a plea agreement to an amended misdemeanor charge for contributing to the deprivation or delinquency of a minor on March 16, 2017. On appeal, Burden argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney advised him to waive his preliminary hearing.

[¶2] A defendant must demonstrate both deficient representation by counsel and prejudice caused by the deficient representation to succeed in a post- conviction relief action. Woehlhoff v. State, 487 N.W.2d 16, 17 (N.D. 1992); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 688, 694 (1984). The district court found that Burden had not established prejudice.

[¶3] We conclude the district court’s findings regarding Burden’s failure to establish prejudice are not clearly erroneous. “Courts need not address both prongs of the Strickland test, and if a court can resolve the case by addressing only one prong it is encouraged to do so.” Osier v. State, 2014 ND 41, ¶ 11, 843 N.W.2d 277. The court did not err in denying Burden’s application for post-conviction relief, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶4] Daniel J. Crothers, Acting C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Dann E. Greenwood, D.J.

[¶5] The Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, D.J., sitting in place of Jenson, C.J., disqualified.