Burden v. State

102 So. 464, 20 Ala. App. 387, 1924 Ala. App. LEXIS 357

• Court: Alabama Court of Appeals
• Decided: December 16, 1924
• Docket: 6 Div. 559.
• Status: Published

Opinion

POSTER, J.

The appellant was convicted of robbery and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of 20 years. From the judgment of conviction he prosecutes this appeal.

There is obviously no merit in the exceptions to the admission of evidence.

The trial court will not be put in error for failure to instruct the jury on the defense of alibi, where charge to this effect was not requested by the defendant in writing. Section 8364, Code 1907, and authorities there cited.

It is not error to refuse a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence where such evidence is merely cumulative. Grissett v. State, 18 Ala. App. 675, 94 So. 271; Fries v. Acme White Lead Co., 201 Ala. 613, 79 So. 45.

The trial court will not be put in error ■ for refusing a motion for new trial on the ground of improper argument of the solicitor, where no objection to such argument was taken on the trial, and where the bill of exceptions fails to show that the remarks complained of in the motion were made.

Appellate courts will not disturb the conclusions or findings of the trial court on motion for new trial, where the finding is based on evidence which is given ore tenus, unless it appears that such findings and conclusions are plainly and palpably contrary to the weight of the evidence. Gris-sett v. State, supra; Hackett v. Cash, 196 Ala. 403, 72 So. 52.

The trial court properly refused the motion for a new trial.

There is no error in the record.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.