Burden v. Muncreef

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Burden v. Muncreef

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 613

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedApril 28, 1773

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 613 (Burden v. Muncreef) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burden v. Muncreef, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 613 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1773).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and it appearing to me on affidavit of Henry Peronneau junior that Charles Pinck-ney Esq. hath had due Notice of said Motion It is Ordered that a Commission do issue for Examination of Witnesses in this Cause.²⁸

Wm Burrows Mg. in Can.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion of Mr. Rutledge Solicitor for the Complainant and it appearing to me on affidavit of Henry Peronneau junior that Charles Pinck-ney Esq. hath had due Notice of said Motion It is Ordered that a Commission do issue for Examination of Witnesses in this Cause.²⁸

Wm Burrows Mg. in Can.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burden-v-muncreef-ctchansc-1773.