Burden v. BTI Empl Screening

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 17, 2001·No. 00-11367·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-11367

DEBRA A. BURDEN, Plaintiff,

DAVID L. SMITH, Appellant,

versus

BTI EMPLOYEE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-2073-BF)

September 14, 2001

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We are persuaded that this court lacks jurisdiction in this

case and that the prosecution of the appeal is frivolous. The

appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. This is a

continuation of vexatious litigation. We award appellee an

additional $750 in attorneys fees to be taxed against appellant,

David L. Smith, together with all costs.

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burden v. BTI Empl Screening, (5th Cir. 2001).

Burden v. BTI Empl Screening (Burden v. BTI Empl Screening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.