Burden v. BTI Empl Screening
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-11367
DEBRA A. BURDEN, Plaintiff,
DAVID L. SMITH, Appellant,
versus
BTI EMPLOYEE SCREENING SERVICES, INC. Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (3:98-CV-2073-BF)
September 14, 2001
Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
We are persuaded that this court lacks jurisdiction in this
case and that the prosecution of the appeal is frivolous. The
appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. This is a
continuation of vexatious litigation. We award appellee an
additional $750 in attorneys fees to be taxed against appellant,
David L. Smith, together with all costs.
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burden v. BTI Empl Screening (Burden v. BTI Empl Screening) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.