Burczynski v. Rodgers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burczynski v. Rodgers

61 A.D.3d 1401, 877 N.Y.S.2d 712

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 2009

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 A.D.3d 1401 (Burczynski v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burczynski v. Rodgers, 61 A.D.3d 1401, 877 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Craig D. Hannah, A.J.), entered May 8, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner father appeals from an order that denied his petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation by providing him with unsupervised home visitation with the parties’ child. Contrary to the contention of the father and the Law Guardian, the record supports Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the child would be served by the continuation of supervised visitation (see Matter of Hall v Porter, 52 AD3d 1289 [2008]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Peradotto, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Craig D. Hannah, A.J.), entered May 8, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner father appeals from an order that denied his petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation by providing him with unsupervised home visitation with the parties’ child. Contrary to the contention of the father and the Law Guardian, the record supports Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the child would be served by the continuation of supervised visitation (see Matter of Hall v Porter, 52 AD3d 1289 [2008]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Peradotto, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.3d 1401, 877 N.Y.S.2d 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burczynski-v-rodgers-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack