Burczynski v. Rodgers

61 A.D.3d 1401, 877 N.Y.S.2d 712
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 24, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Craig D. Hannah, A.J.), entered May 8, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order denied the petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner father appeals from an order that denied his petition seeking to modify a prior order of custody and visitation by providing him with unsupervised home visitation with the parties’ child. Contrary to the contention of the father and the Law Guardian, the record supports Family Court’s determination that the best interests of the child would be served by the continuation of supervised visitation (see Matter of Hall v Porter, 52 AD3d 1289 [2008]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Peradotto, Garni, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burczynski v. Rodgers, 61 A.D.3d 1401, 877 N.Y.S.2d 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

61 A.D.3d 1401 (Burczynski v. Rodgers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Nedia M. v. Ashley M.
2025 NY Slip Op 01731 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
ANDERSON, TRACY v. RONCONE, SARAH
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Anderson v. Roncone
81 A.D.3d 1268 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)