Burchik v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co.

177 So. 484
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 3, 1937
DocketNo. 5484.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 177 So. 484 (Burchik v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burchik v. Yazoo M. v. R. Co., 177 So. 484 (La. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

HAMITER, Judge.

The appeal in this case is from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of action filed by defendant.

In his petition, plaintiff alleges that he received injuries while riding on a freight train owned and negligently operated by defendant company, and prays damages therefor.

• It is obvious that appellant has abandoned the appeal, for he has made no appearance in its behalf, either through oral argument or brief. In a situation of this kind, the judgment appealed from will not be disturbed. Calhoun v. Hodges (La. App.) 174 So. 209, and cases therein cited.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finley v. Police Jury of Catahoula Parish
180 So. 886 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 So. 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burchik-v-yazoo-m-v-r-co-lactapp-1937.