Burchell v. State
This text of 419 So. 2d 358 (Burchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Daniel BURCHELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
E. Summers Sheffey, Dade City, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We strike from the conditions of defendant's probation condition # 12, which states that the defendant "[m]ust not father any children during probation period." See Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Otherwise, we affirm the defendant's conviction and sentences.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 So. 2d 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burchell-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.