Burchell v. State
419 So. 2d 358
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 10, 1982·No. 82-707·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
James Daniel BURCHELL, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
E. Summers Sheffey, Dade City, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We strike from the conditions of defendant's probation condition # 12, which states that the defendant "[m]ust not father any children during probation period." See Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Otherwise, we affirm the defendant's conviction and sentences.
SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burchell v. State, 419 So. 2d 358 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
419 So. 2d 358 (Burchell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Interest of B.B.
26 Fla. Supp. 2d 8 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1987)
Williams v. State
505 So. 2d 478 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Young v. State
438 So. 2d 998 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Howland v. State
420 So. 2d 918 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Pires v. Wainwright
419 So. 2d 358 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)