Burchell v. State

178 So. 2d 830, 43 Ala. App. 19, 1965 Ala. App. LEXIS 284
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 17, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 So. 2d 830 (Burchell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burchell v. State, 178 So. 2d 830, 43 Ala. App. 19, 1965 Ala. App. LEXIS 284 (Ala. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

PRICE, Presiding Judge.

Local Acts 1947, pgs. 113-119, establishing The Limestone County Court in reference to the trial of misdemeanor cases, provides, “the judge shall decide issues of fact without the intervention of a jury, except in cases where the defendant files a written demand for a jury trial with the clerk within thirty days after his arrest, or not later than the trial date if such is less than thirty days after his arrest, * *

The defendant was arrested on September 2, 1964, on a complaint charging illegal possession of prohibited beverages. The warrant of arrest commanded her to appear in the Limestone County Court on Sep[20]*20tember 11, 1964. On that day, on defendant’s motion, the court entered an order continuing the case to September 25th. On September 25th the defendant filed written demand for a jury trial. The judgment entry recites that the demand for jury trial was denied because it was not filed “on first sounding or call of the case on September 11, 1964.” Defendant then moved for a continuance to October 2, 1964. The motion was granted. On October 2, written demand for jury trial was again made. This request was also refused because “not filed at first sounding of the case.”

The trial court proceeded to try the case without a jury.

The only question presented is whether the demand for jury trial was filed within the time prescribed by the provisions of the Act, supra. We hold that it was within the time, and defendant was entitled to a trial by jury.

For the error in denying the request for jury trial the judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

JOHNSON, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burchell v. State
178 So. 2d 831 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 So. 2d 830, 43 Ala. App. 19, 1965 Ala. App. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burchell-v-state-alactapp-1965.