Burcham v. . Wolfe
104 S.E. 651, 180 N.C. 672, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 172
Opinion
Upon examination of the record we find that there was no motion to nonsuit, and no prayer for instruction which raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to be submitted to the jury. Therefore the judgment is.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burcham v. . Wolfe, 104 S.E. 651, 180 N.C. 672, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 172 (N.C. 1920).
104 S.E. 651 (Burcham v. . Wolfe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Elizabeth City v. Hoover
85 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Lea v. . Bridgeman
46 S.E.2d 555 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)