Burcham v. . Wolfe
104 S.E. 651, 180 N.C. 672, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 172
This text of 104 S.E. 651 (Burcham v. . Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burcham v. . Wolfe, 104 S.E. 651, 180 N.C. 672, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 172 (N.C. 1920).
Opinion
Upon examination of the record we find that there was no motion to nonsuit, and no prayer for instruction which raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence to be submitted to the jury. Therefore the judgment is.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Elizabeth City v. Hoover
85 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
Lea v. . Bridgeman
46 S.E.2d 555 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 651, 180 N.C. 672, 1920 N.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burcham-v-wolfe-nc-1920.