Burch v. Whittington

Indiana Supreme Court

Burch v. Whittington

1 Blackf. 348, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 11

DecidedMay 9, 1825

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Blackf. 348 (Burch v. Whittington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burch v. Whittington, 1 Blackf. 348, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 11 (Ind. 1825).

Pincite

Opinion

Holman, J.

The plaintiff in error contends, that this suit should have been instituted by the commissioners of Scott coun-ty, and not by the agent. If such he the case, he should have made the discovery at an earlier period. He not only appeared in the Circuit Court, but acknowledged that he could not gainsay or deny the plaintiff’s action. If he could not gainsay or deny the action in the Circuit Court, he cannot be permitted to do it here

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holman, J.

The plaintiff in error contends, that this suit should have been instituted by the commissioners of Scott coun-ty, and not by the agent. If such he the case, he should have made the discovery at an earlier period. He not only appeared in the Circuit Court, but acknowledged that he could not gainsay or deny the plaintiff’s action. If he could not gainsay or deny the action in the Circuit Court, he cannot be permitted to do it here

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Blackf. 348, 1825 Ind. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-whittington-ind-1825.