Burch v. State

128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 179, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 124
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 22, 1925
Docket16483
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 S.E. 587 (Burch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burch v. State, 128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 179, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 124 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

1. The excerpts from the charge of the court which aré complained of, when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, show no material error.

2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial, based upon the refusal of the court to give to the jury certain written requested charges, are too defective to be considered by this court, since it is not stated in the grounds-that the requests to charge were presented to the judge before the jury had retired to consider their verdict.

3. The verdict was amply ■ authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pratt v. State
142 S.E. 903 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 179, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-state-gactapp-1925.