Burch v. State
This text of 128 S.E. 587 (Burch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The excerpts from the charge of the court which aré complained of, when considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, show no material error.
2. The grounds of the motion for a new trial, based upon the refusal of the court to give to the jury certain written requested charges, are too defective to be considered by this court, since it is not stated in the grounds-that the requests to charge were presented to the judge before the jury had retired to consider their verdict.
3. The verdict was amply ■ authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 179, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-state-gactapp-1925.