Burch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burch v. State

555 So. 2d 1330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 610, 1990 WL 8607

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burch v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7461 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 7, 1990·No. No. 90-0045·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

We reverse the order appealed from because the trial court has failed to grant appellant an evidentiary hearing or to attach portions of the trial record sufficient to demonstrate that appellant is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order of the trial court summarily denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

We reverse the order appealed from because the trial court has failed to grant appellant an evidentiary hearing or to attach portions of the trial record sufficient to demonstrate that appellant is entitled to no relief.

REVERSED.

DOWNEY, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur. ■

Burch v. State, 555 So. 2d 1330, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 610, 1990 WL 8607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

555 So. 2d 1330 (Burch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.