Burch v. Cincinnati Trust Co.

14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 346, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 216
CourtHamilton Circuit Court
DecidedNovember 11, 1911
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 346 (Burch v. Cincinnati Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hamilton Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burch v. Cincinnati Trust Co., 14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 346, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 216 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

Opinion

The order of the probate- court, in that it does not fix a sum below which the shares of stock could not be sold at private sale, is defective and not in compliance with Section .10704, General Code.

Such défect however, does not impair the title to the stock in the plaintiff where it appears that the proceedings in all other respects conformed to the statutes and that the sale was made in good faith, at the market value, and in the absence of -.fraud or collusion.

The petition states a cause of action and the demurrer must be overruled. Sutherland v. Brush, 11 Am. Dec., 282 (notes); Edney v. Baum, 97 N. W. Rep., 252 255; Rockel’s Probate Practice, Vol. 1, p. 420; Jelke v. Goldsmith, Administrator, 52 O. S., 499.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edney v. Baum
97 N.W. 252 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 346, 1911 Ohio Misc. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-cincinnati-trust-co-ohcircthamilton-1911.