Burch v. Chew
This text of 2 Mart. (N.S.) 67 (Burch v. Chew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. The record in this case contains no statement of facts by the Judge, no evidence recorded by the clerk, no certificate that the cause was tried on written documents, no case agreed, nor no bill of exceptions. It is certified by the clerk to contain a true and complete transcript of the record, in the cage as above entitled, and the documents on file in the same. This we held in the case of Monlon vs. Brandt & al's syndics, was not sufficient to enable us to examine the case on its merits [68]*68because it does not prove to us that aB the matters on which the cause was tried, were made apart of the record, 10 Martin, 670.
It is therelore ordered, adjudged, arid decreed, that the appeal be dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Mart. (N.S.) 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-chew-la-1824.