Burch v. . Bush

111 S.E. 873, 183 N.C. 676, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 338
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 29, 1922
StatusPublished

This text of 111 S.E. 873 (Burch v. . Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burch v. . Bush, 111 S.E. 873, 183 N.C. 676, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 338 (N.C. 1922).

Opinion

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury returned the following verdict:

"1. Was the administratrix of S. L. Burch really able and willing to finish cutting the timber according to contract? Answer: `Yes.'

"2. Was the administratrix of S. L. Burch kept from cutting the timber according to contract by any act of the defendants Bush Company? Answer: `Yes.'

"3. What damage, if any, did defendants Bush Company sustain by failure of administratrix of Burch to cut said timber (677) according to contract? Answer: `Nothing.'

"4. What sum was withheld by defendants Bush Company under 10 per cent clause of contract? Answer: `$445.' *Page 724

"5. In what sum, if anything, is estate of S. L. Burch indebted to defendants Bush Company by reason of overpayments on measurements? Answer: `Nothing.'"

From a judgment on the verdict in favor of plaintiff, the defendant appealed. Affirmed on authority of same case, Burch v. Bush, 181 N.C. 125.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burch v. . Bush
106 S.E. 489 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 S.E. 873, 183 N.C. 676, 1922 N.C. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burch-v-bush-nc-1922.