Burbridge v. Howard

Appellate Court of Illinois

Burbridge v. Howard

184 Ill. App. 185

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 16, 1913·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Creighton

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Pleading, § 232*—discretion as to allowance of amendments. Though the power to grant leave to amend pleadings is within the discretion of the court, such discretion must in all cases he reasonably exercised. 4. Appeal and error, § 1362*—lohen refusal to permit amendment of declaration reversible error. In an action on an attachment bond, refusal of court to permit plaintiff to amend his declaration at the time of trial, held reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Creighton

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Pleading, § 232*—discretion as to allowance of amendments. Though the power to grant leave to amend pleadings is within the discretion of the court, such discretion must in all cases he reasonably exercised. 4. Appeal and error, § 1362*—lohen refusal to permit amendment of declaration reversible error. In an action on an attachment bond, refusal of court to permit plaintiff to amend his declaration at the time of trial, held reversible error.

Burbridge v. Howard, 184 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

184 Ill. App. 185 (Burbridge v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related